- From: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 21:46:59 +0100
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 14/06/2016 20:55, Steven Rowat wrote: > On 6/14/16 10:52 AM, james anderson wrote: >> >>> On 2016-06-14, at 16:03, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com >>> <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: >>> >>> On 06/14/2016 03:55 AM, james anderson wrote: >>>> yes, why is “self-sovereign” a more appropriate term than >>>> “sovereign”? > >>> These aren't identifiers that nation states have control over, these are >>> identifiers that individual entities have control over. > > [snip] >>> Hope that helps explain the careful deliberation around the >>> self-sovereign term. >> >> it indicates that you may have intended to, but it does not convince. >> best regards, from berlin, >> >> --- >> james anderson | james@dydra.com <mailto:james@dydra.com> | >> http://dydra.com > > > Hmm...Manu has used the word 'control' twice in his explanation above. > Is that closer? What would your opinion be of > > Self-Controlled Credentials > or > Self-Controlled Identity +1 > > > Steven > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2016 20:47:19 UTC