- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:40:08 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok3mmaUe6S215PfpwF7pMBRWncHHtmfEN1iKxZdegmxquQ@mail.gmail.com>
it's not that simple. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice_of_law + Current implementation: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bHmB8_f7ASRHm97TwhZmmEQnTKU&usp=sharing Tim.h. On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 at 09:33 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 June 2016 at 20:36, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > >> On 06/12/2016 10:30 PM, Timothy Holborn wrote: >> >>> I'm listening to: http://w3c.github.io/vctf/meetings/2016-06-08/ >>> @~40 minutes an issue about whether or not the Decentralised >>> identifier methodology works and until their is something that exists >>> with a million or so use it - it's a research project.. >>> >>> So, Internet protocol and the Domain Name Server methodology, how's >>> that not a decentralised identifier system for machines? >>> >> >> It is, but it's not self-sovereign. >> >> http://opencreds.org/specs/source/webdht/ >> >> "The Web currently does not have a mechanism where people and >> organizations can claim identifiers that they have sole ownership over. >> Identifiers, such as those rooted in domain names like emails addresses >> and website addresses, are effectively rented by people and >> organizations rather than owned. Therefore, their use as long-term >> identifiers is dependent upon parameters outside of their control. One >> danger is that if the rent is not paid, all data associated with the >> identifier can be made temporarily or permanently inaccessible. This >> document specifies a mechanism where people and organizations can >> cryptographically claim ownership over identifiers such that they >> control them and the documents that they refer to." >> > > This is not a significant danger. It's like saying the google could lose > google.com due to factors outside of their control. It wont happen, will > it? > > The fact is there's a small management fee for maintaining a global lookup > table, which can be as low as $1 a year, and if you want a vanity address > it's a bit more expensive. > > What you get for that price is participation in the biggest global network > in the history of the planet, allowing you to publish arbitrary documents > and code, for you, and anyone you wish to put on a subdomain. We've never > had anything like this before. > > >> >> >> -- >> Dave Longley >> CTO >> Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> http://digitalbazaar.com >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2016 00:40:49 UTC