W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2016

Re: VOTE: Verifiable Claims Terminology

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 06:23:56 +0200
Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D6D53C09-688F-494F-B891-17C3640FADE5@bblfish.net>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
For "Consumer/Inspector/Relying Party/etc."

why not Guard? That's how we named it for WebID-TLS


> On 10 Jun 2016, at 06:18, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> In order to make the terminology used across all Verifiable Claims
> proposal documents consistent, we need to seek consensus on the proper
> terms. This poll is an attempt to seek consensus on the terms we will
> use for the Verifiable Claims Working Group Proposal.
> The poll is an Instant Runoff Vote (IRV). There are three contests, make
> sure to order your choices in all three. Drag the candidates to arrange
> them in order of preference with your favorite at the top and your least
> favorite at the bottom.
> The poll opens now and will close at midnight (ET) on June 15th.
> Be sure to take time carefully ranking items, even the ones at the
> bottom (it matters in an IRV).
> https://www.opavote.com/vote/6609369386975232
> -- manu
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching
> https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/
Received on Friday, 10 June 2016 04:24:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:53 UTC