- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 04:14:12 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok23LZqhaTquLxmkCkt5Zson7hd9zCAuKtOLxOwRU4aJBw@mail.gmail.com>
With regard to the Identity. i've got two points. one is a way of thinking about it, the other is a suggested term 'entity' which is less important than the way of thinking about how to label this data container / identifier. If we agree that legal entities are responsible for agents, whether they've been issued to machines or otherwise, then we've got incorporated legal entities and natural legal entities - i'm not sure if their are any others? what about countries? I figure the controller would still be a legal entity where applied to the notion of 'actor' A.I. and other smart machines may in-turn become actors, but they're not legally responsible. So therefore; i'm thinking the term 'Entity' as apposed to 'identity'. We can't really independently provide 'identity' to humans, the foundation layer actors of any systems produced. I think we are working on that - but it's still an unsolved problem for WWW/Linked-Data/Web 3.0. TimBL / Vint Cerf / Others are talking about that kinda thing now: http://www.decentralizedweb.net/ Credentials relates specifically to the issuance of a verified claim - that is - something that an entity or coordinated group of entities (say, employee's within a company) says about another entity. the 'entity' concept is therefore considered as a legal short-hand method for denoting 'legal entity', which in-turn means if the 'identity' goes astray, we're not misappropriating the rights of person - but rather - some 'thing' that is clearly denoted as an 'entity' for which it pertains to a particular legal entity (inferring ownership / property rights). Thoughts? Tim.h On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 at 11:58 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The SAMPLE ballot for the upcoming terminology vote can be found here > (do not vote, it won't be counted!): > > https://www.opavote.com/vote/6609369386975232 > > Did I miss any of the terminology options that were put forward as > choices that should be in the poll? > > This will be an Instant Run Off vote based on ranked choice. This means > that you just order the items by your personal preference with the most > desired option at the top and the least desired option at the bottom. > > The vote will open this Friday and close the following Wednesday. > Apologies for the short poll duration, but we're on a tight schedule. My > hope is that we get early voters on Friday, a few more over the weekend, > and catch anyone that missed the first announcement on the Tuesday call. > We'll close Wednesday, which will give the editors two business days to > clean up all of the documents before asking the Web Payments IG to start > reviewing the documents on the 20th of June. > > Please ensure that you're okay with the sample poll above because once > the polls open on Friday, that's it for this round of terminology > discussion/voting. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching > https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/ > >
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 04:14:50 UTC