- From: Joe Andrieu <joe@joeandrieu.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:33:30 -0700
- To: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>, public-credentials@w3.org
Thanks, David. I will review your comment and the rest of the document with an eye to that mistake. I would not be surprised that I misspeak. I do contend that an identity doesn't exist without an observer making a correlation, but if I say that identity doesn't "occur", that would be confusing. On Wed, Jun 8, 2016, at 10:14 AM, David Chadwick wrote: > > > Joe wrote: > > Also, here's the current draft of the upcoming white paper on "identity" > > and "correlation". It's not complete, but you can get a bit more detail > > on the argument and a few examples of what we mean. > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nxo7jXrfg0s5nAXS4ue0uERm6aAAUF39HczgwygJLFk/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Again, I realize it might be too late to shift that language, but if we > > can, I think it would significantly improve the clarity and simplicity > > of the documents. > > Hi Joe > > I have just commented on your whitepaper, making the remark that I think > you are wrongly using the term 'identity' when you should be using the > term 'identification'. It is identification that occurs when correlation > takes place. > > regards > > David -- Joe Andrieu joe@joeandrieu.com +1(805)705-8651 http://blog.joeandrieu.com
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 17:33:54 UTC