Re: Accessibility in Verifiable Claims

Are we referring to ADA compliance with respect to accessibility?
http://www.pva.org/site/c.ajIRK9NJLcJ2E/b.6441553/k.3BE8/Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_ADA.htm

Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TrueCred™ | Digital Credential Trust™
------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Eric R. Korb | Chief Executive Officer | Warren, New Jersey*
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:

> I will ensure it is addressed.
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Shane,
>>
>> One of the comments in the Verifiable Claims charter survey says this:
>>
>> """
>> It would be good for accessibility to be recognised in the use cases
>> guiding this work. The ability for someone with a disability to
>> confidently verify themselves offers a degree of trust that is simply
>> not obtainable at present.
>> """
>>
>> I thought we mentioned a11y prominently in a few of the use cases, but
>> upon scanning them again, I can't find any mention of a11y. What's the
>> plan to make sure we mention a11y in the use cases?
>>
>> Note: We mention a11y prominently in the draft charter, so we're sort of
>> covered, but it would probably be a good idea to mention a11y in the use
>> cases as well.
>>
>> -- manu
>>
>> --
>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>> JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching
>> https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>

Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2016 18:29:49 UTC