- From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:05:01 -0700
- To: Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 6/7/16 9:25 AM, Christopher Allen wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 7, 2016, Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com > <mailto:danielcburnett@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Just to follow up on my final suggestion during the call. My > intent was to suggest that, as best we can without destroying the > verbal flow of our documents, we consider noting that the term > 'consumer' is still under discussion and may change to another > word in the future. > > > Confusion on that word in Verifiable Claims docs definitely has caused > some problems for me recently — everyone's first reaction is B2C, > which it is not. +1 on the B2C common usage confusion. +1 on "Inspector", as now used in the Architecture document. Can this be used throughout the documents right away? 'Inspector' may not be perfect, but it avoids the B2C error problem and having a single term standardized across the documents is crucial for avoiding other (and unnecessary) types of reader confusions. Steven
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2016 17:05:32 UTC