- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 16:32:52 +0000
- To: Eric Korb <eric.korb@accreditrust.com>, W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok1+OAAiFHs33-Y8NnXA6twnUD=6BWrRLBCkuDP0S1fUzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Oh. I also note in many industries, people don't have qualifications. Does Manu have a PHD in linked data technologies? Why not? On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 at 3:31 AM, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll follow-up tomorrow. Agreed. Yet. I was targeting the issue that > whereas corruption has been ok, because technology hasn't been able to > provide verifiability of claims fairly, should new means be deployed in a > wholesale basis, then people may loose jobs. > > Which would IMHO be a good thing. Yet, this example is simply the impact > within the qualifications verification social measurement vectors. > > I would expect an array of outcomes throughout multiple markets, lowering > costs, improving effectiveness and efficiencies, decrease in fraudulent > activities, etc. > > We can do a lot of that with graph technology today, but IMHO, it's harder > to apply ACL's which often results in prevlidged access, rather than > customised ACL capabilities for 'those who need to know', et.al. > > Across the board. > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 at 3:19 AM, Eric Korb <eric.korb@accreditrust.com> > wrote: > >> In a recent survey conducted by Parchment, 550 "learners believe it’s >> acceptable to share a copy of their credential and display it publicly >> online through social sites" >> >> This is being done without a standard way to prove the authenticity >> (trust) of the credential by consumers. >> >> Issuer's would rather offer learners (credential Holders) a solution that >> serves the needs of all stakeholders. The lack thereof, has learners >> "hacking" thier own methods. That, IMHO, is the main motivation for >> Education. >> >> Eric Korb @accreditrust >> >> On Feb 20, 2016 3:10 AM, "Timothy Holborn" <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Was hoping someone might be able to provide links for some stats. >> > >> > specifically; statistic that denotes the difference between the number >> of people who claim to have received an academic qualification in any given >> year vs. the number of students who successfully attained an outcome in >> that same year across the academic sector. >> > >> > I think it might help demonstrate some of the underlying issues that >> may cause difficulties in successfully making these technologies available. >> some people may not be so keen on supporting credentials, as this statistic >> would demonstrate a potential impact on the capacity for people to maintain >> employment / feed families, due to new information that may be less >> fortunately made available to employers... >> > >> > I imagine given the way institutional systems are deployed it would >> happen on a wholesale basis, should it be taken-up. >> > >> > (not that I'm suggesting only people with qualifications are capable of >> effectively furfiling a particular task; obviously, some industries it's >> more important than others, et.al.) >> > >> > Tim. >> >
Received on Sunday, 21 February 2016 16:33:30 UTC