- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:35:44 +0200
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>, public-credentials@w3.org
On 2016-08-16 17:19, Timothy Holborn wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 at 01:14 Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net <mailto:steven_rowat@sunshine.net>> wrote: > > On 8/16/16 7:38 AM, Timothy Holborn wrote: > > > don't need lawyers - just need a 'magna carta for the web', not a new > > concept. > > Might ODRL, (Open Digital Rights Language), which specifies in detail > the policy of the data's creator/owner, including downstream rights > for usage (commercial, non-commercial, any mix), be something like > that 'magna carta for the web', -- if it was legally binding? > > I believe the works of ODRL have enormous merit. However, i believe the legal mechanism for enabling a legally-binding usage term is via 'license'. > > Creative commons demonstrates this concept, but not for platform licensing. Tim, I must confess that I haven't the faintest idea of what you are talking about :-( Who licenses what from whom, and most important of all, why? Anders > > > Steven > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2016 15:36:17 UTC