Summary of WPIG / Verifiable Claims Task Force Proposal discussion

This is a summary of how the Verifiable Claims Task Force Proposal
discussion went in the Web Payments Interest Group.

In general, comments were largely positive. There was concern that
tokenization of data was not listed in the problem statement and it
should be. There was also concern that we didn't spell out the value-add
for the market verticals (finance, education, healthcare). There was
support to "move to the next step".

"Moving to the next step" looks like this right now:

We need to make sure we have a crisp problem statement that has buy in
from a wide variety of organizations. We've done a first pass at this,
but will need to do a second pass to include some organizations that
didn't participate in the first round.

We will be meeting next week on Tuesday (December 1st) at 11am to
discuss the problem statement. We'll go into the details of what this
discussion will look like tomorrow during the Credentials CG call.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/

Received on Monday, 23 November 2015 19:46:00 UTC