- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 16:38:56 -0500
- To: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 11/22/2015 11:28 AM, David Chadwick wrote: > > On 22/11/2015 15:25, Dave Longley wrote: >> >> It would be better to only have to get access to your IdP vs. >> having to go out and retrieve all of your credentials again. You >> could also use a mechanism to add more than one FIDO device to >> authenticate with your IdP or use additional alternative >> authentication mechanisms. Adding an additional/backup FIDO device >> wouldn't require visiting all of your issuers to get your >> credentials tied to the new device; you'd only have to undergo a >> linking process to tie it to the same identity at your IdP. > > If you have two FIDO devices then you might as well register then > both with your issuers, then you have two ways of authenticating to > them and getting credentials. It would be good if FIDO could add a > mechanism for linking devices (keys) together as part of its > specifications, so that two or more keys can be registered to the > same account. I dont know if they have considered this or not. I can > ask. Yeah, ideally I wouldn't have to go about registering both with all of the issuers as well as my IdP/Identity Agent. Linking two FIDO devices together so one functions as a backup would be the preferred method (from a usability standpoint). I wouldn't want to do any more work than that. > >> >> We have another layer (the WebDHT) that lets you specify public >> keys that give you access to one of your identities. In the design, >> we also want to add the ability for users to specify other keys or >> identities that can vouch for you. Provided that you can obtain M >> of N signatures from those other parties, you can add a new key to >> get access to your identity again if you had lost it. We're trying >> to make it as painless as possible, yet still secure, for people to >> use these systems. > > Understood. I think that usability functions like the above will grow > as user demand for them grows. There is a balance to be struck > between making the initial system all singing and dancing, but too > complex for implementors to want to bother implementing it. I agree -- trade offs. But I don't think the system we've been designing in the Credentials CG goes too far in its level of complexity. -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc.
Received on Sunday, 22 November 2015 21:39:24 UTC