- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 23:26:16 +0000
- To: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 23:26:54 UTC
So, How would notation be provided to declare whether something is mandatory or optional. Preferences. Rationale Where in the spec are we outlining WoT extensions that better support complex usecases. The below example has alot of opportunities. Yet equally could be used in nefarious ways, making demands for biological products, and other forms of questionable application. The difference is likely defined in notation, whether that be part of the applied linkeddata application of credentials standards work, or otherwise. On 21:32, Thu, 11/06/2015 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/blood-donors-in-sweden-get-a-text-message-whenever-someone-is-helped-with-their-blood-10310101.html > > The idea of issuing someone a verified badge notating how many lives > they've saved? > > Would change the way I read a linkedin profile... >
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 23:26:54 UTC