@Kerri @all (reposted) We had a deep conversation during our last Credentials Community Call on Nov 25, 2014. May I suggest that you read the minutes (listen to audio reply) that can be found here: http://www.w3.org/community/credentials/ IMHO, trying to support more than one signature type would not be the best course of action because it would make implementations really complicated. I expect the CCG to continue to evaluate the technical merits of JOSE and SM methodologies, but more importantly their applicability to micro-credentials. Thanks for the input. Eric On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Kerri Lemoie <kerri@achievery.com> wrote: > I'm a little bit late jumping in on this thread. I've been thinking about > Jason's message. > > Currently the verification type is binary - either hosted or signed. > Should we consider extending the verification type so that it can include > both JOSE and JSON-LD and for that matter any type we haven't yet > considered? Verifiers/validators can then determine what they will accept. > All that the standard needs to provide is that a verification type is > required. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 18:14:45 UTC