- From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:20:35 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL02cgTEUJmcpLq50KxecR2TDTzdSLxigpu1RQ1a=MAhhOAn3A@mail.gmail.com>
When I wrote that, there was no flattened serialization. I'm currently
revising to use JWS.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Quick question for you re: ACME - why did you decide to not use the JWS
> base64-encoding mechanism in the signature for ACME? Particularly,
> you've specified multiple canonicalization mechanisms (signature-input).
>
> The reason I'm asking is because we're trying to get some insight into
> whether or not the base64-encoded approach should be used when digitally
> signing credentials in the Credentials Community Group, or if you
> suggest we specify our own canonicalization mechanism and re-use the JWS
> alg/nonce/sig fields?
>
> On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> >
> https://github.com/letsencrypt/acme-spec/blob/master/draft-barnes-acme.md
> >
> > {
> > "type": "certificateRequest",
> > "csr": "5jNudRx6Ye4HzKEqT5...FS6aKdZeGsysoCo4H9P",
> > "signature": {
> > "alg": "RS256",
> > "nonce": "h5aYpWVkq-xlJh6cpR-3cw",
> > "sig": "KxITJ0rNlfDMAtfDr8eAw...fSSoehDFNZKQKzTZPtQ",
> > "jwk": {
> > "kty":"RSA",
> > "e":"AQAB",
> > "n":"KxITJ0rNlfDMAtfDr8eAw...fSSoehDFNZKQKzTZPtQ"
> > }
> > }
> > }
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments
> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
>
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 17:21:03 UTC