- From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:20:35 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL02cgTEUJmcpLq50KxecR2TDTzdSLxigpu1RQ1a=MAhhOAn3A@mail.gmail.com>
When I wrote that, there was no flattened serialization. I'm currently revising to use JWS. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Richard, > > Quick question for you re: ACME - why did you decide to not use the JWS > base64-encoding mechanism in the signature for ACME? Particularly, > you've specified multiple canonicalization mechanisms (signature-input). > > The reason I'm asking is because we're trying to get some insight into > whether or not the base64-encoded approach should be used when digitally > signing credentials in the Credentials Community Group, or if you > suggest we specify our own canonicalization mechanism and re-use the JWS > alg/nonce/sig fields? > > On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > > > https://github.com/letsencrypt/acme-spec/blob/master/draft-barnes-acme.md > > > > { > > "type": "certificateRequest", > > "csr": "5jNudRx6Ye4HzKEqT5...FS6aKdZeGsysoCo4H9P", > > "signature": { > > "alg": "RS256", > > "nonce": "h5aYpWVkq-xlJh6cpR-3cw", > > "sig": "KxITJ0rNlfDMAtfDr8eAw...fSSoehDFNZKQKzTZPtQ", > > "jwk": { > > "kty":"RSA", > > "e":"AQAB", > > "n":"KxITJ0rNlfDMAtfDr8eAw...fSSoehDFNZKQKzTZPtQ" > > } > > } > > } > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments > http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/ >
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 17:21:03 UTC