- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:45:08 -0700
- To: <public-covid-19@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <010101d5fb0a$9dced400$d96c7c00$@acm.org>
Welcome new members Simon Pietro Romano, Eva Méndez, glad to have your expertise and perspectives. I posted a short document https://www.w3.org/community/covid-19/drafts-for-discussion/ with pointers to other documents so people can find them when visiting the group home page, https://www.w3.org/community/covid-19/ I think the charter “scope” is important; how do we wind up narrowing the scope of work so that we don’t wind up in a “boil the ocean” scenario, while producing something that is generally useful? My current thought is to split the “Going Remote” document into “Use Cases” and “Requirements”, and for “Use Cases” to focus on collecting POINTERS to documents about (at least partially) SUCCESSFUL transitions to all remote. We should prioritize RECENT transitions if we can, in order to really act as a “clearinghouse” of best practices. That’s a subset of the topics outlined so far…. We can expand later to cover use cases where no one has successfully deployed a solution but with some more work it might. Opinions? -- https://LarryMasinter.net
Received on Sunday, 15 March 2020 20:45:24 UTC