- From: Lynn Foster <foster.j.lynn@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:34:38 -0500
- To: Daniel Harris <daniel@kendra.org.uk>
- Cc: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, public-council@w3.org, harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-social-interest@w3.org" <public-social-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACvmXVxyaFTG=-gSFtGF9iE233jmoFPANU1pf7NK-W5XmWUyiw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, chiming in late, sorry. I also like the idea of starting a new group, I very much like "Collaborative Economy" as a name and a focus, and would like to participate. Lynn http://mikorizal.org On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Daniel Harris <daniel@kendra.org.uk> wrote: > Hi elf, > > I like everything you say. Though it's still pretty broad. But that's OK. > And using recognisable terminology is good too. I'm excited! > > And in lieu of Ian's comments I'd say just start a new group and post a > message in the old group to get them to join the new group. Count me in! > > Cheers Daniel > > On 20 Aug 2015, at 17:17, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> > wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On 08/20/2015 04:17 PM, Daniel Harris wrote: > >>> Since than, many new open source project emerged working in field of > >>> Collaborative Economy and I would like to offer a venue to various > >>> people who work on them to give more focus to make them gradually more > >>> interoperable. > >>> > >>> I consider proposing Collaborative Economy Community Group, following > >>> naming used on social media. (for example on twitter > >>> https://twitter.com/hashtag/CollaborativeEconomy) and using #collecon > >>> IRC channel and collecon-public@w3.org mailing list. > >> > >> I must admit I prefer "Collaboration IO" to "Collaborative Economy". > Use #collabio? > >> > >> But, I guess, if you are trying to appeal to those who are conversant > with "Collaborative Economy" (a la OuiShare, Shareable...) then perhaps the > more well used/recognised words are more appropriate and better to get > engagement and adoption. > > > > I find myself making big mistake in setting way to broad context in > > Community I/O, Collaboration I/O still seems super generic and in many > > ways I/O can create more confusion than clarification. > > > > I want to emphasize the Economy part, and work around established terms > > like Sharing Economy, Collaborative Consumption and in last years more > > balanced Collaborative Economy. I would even include in description > > couple of more specific tags: #carpooling #ridesharing #mealsharing > > #foodcoops #coworking #hospitality #coliving #volunteering #swapping > > #skillsharing #coproduction #commons etc. > > > > I would also like to make it clear that it doesn't exclude commerce, but > > at the same time puts clearly in scope economic interactions based on > > sharing, collaboration, prosumption, volunteering etc. > > > > Also staying agnostic towards various possible forms of accounting, > > those already existing: barter, monatary purchase, reputation based > > grant, donation/gift, merit/karma etc. as well as those now unknown but > > which will appear in the future. > > > > Maybe starting with writing a clear charter draft, together with other > > interested people would make sense here? I would also refer to some > > particular candidate technologies, for example: > > > > * http://goodrelations-vocabulary.org > > * http://schema.org/Offer, http://schema.org/Demand, > > http://schema.org/Service > > * http://microformats.org/wiki/h-listing > > * https://web-payments.org/specs/ > > > > I think this would allow better decision for a possible venue... > > > > Cheers! > > > > >
Received on Friday, 28 August 2015 15:35:27 UTC