W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-council@w3.org > August 2015

Re: to recycle old and inactive CG (Community I/O) or to propose new one (Collaborative Economy)?

From: Lynn Foster <foster.j.lynn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:34:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CACvmXVxyaFTG=-gSFtGF9iE233jmoFPANU1pf7NK-W5XmWUyiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Harris <daniel@kendra.org.uk>
Cc: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, public-council@w3.org, harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-social-interest@w3.org" <public-social-interest@w3.org>
Hi, chiming in late, sorry.  I also like the idea of starting a new group,
I very much like "Collaborative Economy" as a name and a focus, and would
like to participate.

Lynn
http://mikorizal.org

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Daniel Harris <daniel@kendra.org.uk> wrote:

> Hi elf,
>
> I like everything you say. Though it's still pretty broad. But that's OK.
> And using recognisable terminology is good too. I'm excited!
>
> And in lieu of Ian's comments I'd say just start a new group and post a
> message in the old group to get them to join the new group. Count me in!
>
> Cheers Daniel
>
> On 20 Aug 2015, at 17:17, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On 08/20/2015 04:17 PM, Daniel Harris wrote:
> >>> Since than, many new open source project emerged working in field of
> >>> Collaborative Economy and I would like to offer a venue to various
> >>> people who work on them to give more focus to make them gradually more
> >>> interoperable.
> >>>
> >>> I consider proposing Collaborative Economy Community Group, following
> >>> naming used on social media. (for example on twitter
> >>> https://twitter.com/hashtag/CollaborativeEconomy) and using #collecon
> >>> IRC channel and collecon-public@w3.org mailing list.
> >>
> >> I must admit I prefer "Collaboration IO" to "Collaborative Economy".
> Use #collabio?
> >>
> >> But, I guess, if you are trying to appeal to those who are conversant
> with "Collaborative Economy" (a la OuiShare, Shareable...) then perhaps the
> more well used/recognised words are more appropriate and better to get
> engagement and adoption.
> >
> > I find myself making big mistake in setting way to broad context in
> > Community I/O, Collaboration I/O still seems super generic and in many
> > ways I/O can create more confusion than clarification.
> >
> > I want to emphasize the Economy part, and work around established terms
> > like Sharing Economy, Collaborative Consumption and in last years more
> > balanced Collaborative Economy. I would even include in description
> > couple of more specific tags: #carpooling #ridesharing #mealsharing
> > #foodcoops #coworking #hospitality #coliving #volunteering #swapping
> > #skillsharing #coproduction #commons etc.
> >
> > I would also like to make it clear that it doesn't exclude commerce, but
> > at the same time puts clearly in scope economic interactions based on
> > sharing, collaboration, prosumption, volunteering etc.
> >
> > Also staying agnostic towards various possible forms of accounting,
> > those already existing: barter, monatary purchase, reputation based
> > grant, donation/gift, merit/karma etc. as well as those now unknown but
> > which will appear in the future.
> >
> > Maybe starting with writing a clear charter draft, together with other
> > interested people would make sense here? I would also refer to some
> > particular candidate technologies, for example:
> >
> > * http://goodrelations-vocabulary.org
> > * http://schema.org/Offer, http://schema.org/Demand,
> > http://schema.org/Service
> > * http://microformats.org/wiki/h-listing
> > * https://web-payments.org/specs/
> >
> > I think this would allow better decision for a possible venue...
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 28 August 2015 15:35:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:16:39 UTC