- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:43:49 -0700
- To: public-council@w3.org
This is a simplified version of what I posted here earlier. This post is just to make it available for anyone who wanted to use it. https://wcarr.github.io/cg-charter/AffiliatedCGCharter.html Charter for Community Group affiliated with a W3C Working Group. CG may have a large number of specifications and it must be easy to add or remove Specifications without rechartering. Must be able to explore beyond Working Group's scope and deliverables to explore potential new work for the Working Group. 1. Designed for Community Group that can work outside the deliverables and scope or the Working Group it is affiliated with 2. Potentially large number of specs where the list of specs can be easily added to without rechartering 3. Community Group can work on a Working Group chartered deliverable only when WG asks it to 4. Community Group can explore whatever else it wants to 5. If WG picks up work from the Community Group, the Community Group stops work on that spec unless the Working Group asks for it to continue (so not parallel work on a spec unless the WG is asking for that) 6. Charter points to documents in GitHub that list deliverables that are also deliverables in the WG (WG requests) and separately deliverables initiated by the Community Group. Specifically, any Specifications with patent licensing obligations for contributions must be listed separately. This type of Community Group could have a lot of specs and changes to the list, so information in one known place will help manage that (for licensing and contribution purposes - e.g. companies could decide to inform their representatives no to contribute to particular specs; the CLA is contribution based.). 7. Usual rules for fairness and decision making from the optional CG Charter template from the W3C CG site, except that the WG controls developing the Charter, not the CG itself. The process rules are for the exceptional case where a CG cannot make decisions by less formal methods. They are a fallback if things go wrong to ensure fairness. Here are a couple of other Charter templates designed for other types of Community Groups. 1. Like the above, but not directly affiliated with any WG https://wcarr.github.io/cg-charter/FlexibleCGCharter.html 2. For CG with known, stable deliverables where all specs are described in the Charter (this is the same as on the CG website, except in html format, not markdown) https://wcarr.github.io/cg-charter/CGCharter.html
Received on Friday, 17 April 2015 17:44:18 UTC