- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:04:46 -0700
- To: public-council@w3.org
- Message-ID: <551BECEE.2000406@linux.intel.com>
An update is attached. We're using a related template for a Community Group and there have been significant improvements in it related to use of GitHub. Here is where the latest versions are: http://wcarr.github.io/cg-charter/ and I'll attach the updated version here as well and here is the URL https://wcarr.github.io/cg-charter/W3CWGAffiliatedCGCharterl20150331.html On 2015-03-28 16:40, Wayne Carr wrote: > > Community Groups choose their own Charter. The template attached to > this provides one approach. > > Template forCommunity Group Affiliated with a Working Group - > potentially large number of specs and easy to add specs > > Goal: provide a place for a large Working Group like Web Apps or CSS > to explore new areas of work, possibly outside their current scope. > This could be for incubation work, not yet ready for the WG, but in an > area the WG is interested in for possible future work. > > 1a. Working Groups can pick up specifications from any Community > Group. Affiliated Community Groups are different only in that a > Working Group controls its charter and requests that it work on > particular specifications, reports or code. Working Group can ask the > Affiliated Community Group to work on areas outside the Working Group > scope to explore new areas, including incubator, exploratory specs. > Community Group volunteers decide whether to work on each spec. > 1b. CG Charter written/modified by Working Group. > 1c. To provide protection against unintended contribution in a group > with potentially many specs and a scope that can expand, Community > Group participants must opt-in to work on a particular spec (makes it > easier to join CG) > 1d. Community Group uses GitHub > 1e. Fairness rules in Charter > >
Attachments
- text/html attachment: W3CWGAffiliatedCGCharterl20150331.html
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 13:05:25 UTC