Re: Feb 2013 edition of "Standards for Web Applications on Mobile: current state and roadmap"

On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:18:43 +0100, Innovimax W3C  
<innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> wrote:

> Instead of Broken Medal, probably simply a Silver Medal would do the  
> trick (or Chocolate Medal ?)

Agree. Maybe with some text distinguishing it for those who aren't getting  
the full colour effect.

My 2 kopeks

chaals

> My two cents
>
> Mohamed
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux  
> <dom@w3.org>wrote:
>
>> Le lundi 04 mars 2013 à 15:17 +0100, Tobie Langel a écrit :
>> > FYI. I see a couple of specs we mention as only partially addressing
>> > requirements in Section 5[1] that are present in your document but
>> > don't get a Coremob medal (e.g. full-sreen, orientation lock).
>>
>> Indeed, I hesitated on whether they should get the medal or not...
>>
>> > This makes sense but at the same time seems to indicate that we don't
>> > really care about them. Which is exactly the opposite of the message
>> > we're trying to get through.
>> >
>> > Would maybe adding a Coremob medal broken in half convey our intention
>> > better?
>>
>> Hmm... Maybe, although something broken might convey the opposite idea
>> as well... If anyone feel like proposing something, the SVG I've used
>> for the medals is at:
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/02/mobile-web-app-state/coremob.svg
>>
>> Dom
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 00:11:01 UTC