- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:53:20 +0100
- To: public-coremob@w3.org
On 05/03/13 10:44, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le mardi 05 mars 2013 à 09:59 +0100, Mounir Lamouri a écrit : >> FWIW, there is a small mistake: Firefox Mobile supports <input >> type='{date,time}'> but not all of them yet (I guess it could be marked >> as partial). > > Good catch! I've corrected this, and also sent a related patch to > caniuse.com, one of the sources I use to keep the data uptodate: > https://github.com/Fyrd/caniuse/pull/139 Thanks :) > (as an aside, MDN doesn't know about it either > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/HTML/Element/Input ) Indeed, our documentation team has to update that but I believe this is on their todo list. >> Also, maybe it could be worth having a Firefox OS entry for the next >> issue of this report? > > Yeah, I've been wondering how to report implementations from Web-based > OS (and in particular based on work in SysApps), but haven't quite > figured it out. It might be that a separate report would make sense (or > just a separate section in this report?) I think Firefox OS should be added as another implementations (like Firefox Mobile, Android browser or Chrome Mobile). I would see specifications from SysApps as other items in the report. If we want to push the Web as a Platform, I do not believe it would be a good idea to do a strong distinction between SysApps and the rest. Maybe adding a simple disclaimer before the SysApps section saying that those specs are meant to be implemented outside of the browser scope would be fair though. Cheers, -- Mounir
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 09:53:47 UTC