On 19 April 2013 18:34, Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com> wrote: > On Friday, April 19, 2013 at 6:58 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: > > So for those that can't join the IG, you are saying "thanks for your > efforts, if you want to continue participating send cash, and btw we are > taking over your work and shutting your CG down". > > > > Not a good message to send. > We've yet to hear from someone that would like to continue contributing to > Coremob but can't join the IG. > > I read Jo's proposal as Coremob maturing into an IG, not as an attempt to > shut the CG down, steal the group's work or what not. > > I also think that Dominique's contributions were extremely valuable to the > group's effort and helped shape our deliverables into something palatable > and impactful. Moving to an IG helps keeping him onboard and, that in > itself, is valuable enough for me (especially given I'm yet to understand > which key contributor we'd loose if we move to an IG). > > --tobie > > Brian, Tobie, Firstly, whilst I've enjoyed participating in CoreMob over the past year, it's my first involvement with W3C, and I'm not familiar with the precise impact of the changes that are being discussed. I hope that the Financial Times can continue to participate, and I believe that as our parent company (Pearson) has recently joined the W3C [1] that this will be possible. Rob [1] http://blog.pearson.com/2013/04/pearson_is_the_first.trackback.html -- ------------------------------ This email was sent by a company owned by Pearson plc, registered office at 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL. Registered in England and Wales with company number 53723.
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 11:00:43 UTC