Re: Shall we shelve Level Zero?

I would prefer that the rings represent features like ring 0 == text, ring 1 == images, ring 2 == JavaScript, ring 3 == audio, ring 4 == video...

I also don't think that failing an inner ring should halt testing on outer rings. The web developer should be able to see the level of compatibility across several rings at once. For example, if a developer is trying to build an app that needs a ring 997 feature (let's say 'teleportation') they should be able to see if that works even if the browser has a bug with vertical Hiragana text in ring 42. 

I also think we should grade the compatibility (not binary gray/green.) 

-- Jet

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Grigsby" <jason@cloudfour.com>
To: "jeanfrancois moy" <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>
Cc: tobie@fb.com, robin@berjon.com, public-coremob@w3.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 2:33:55 PM
Subject: Re: Shall we shelve Level Zero?

On May 2, 2012, at 10:21 AM, <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com> <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com> wrote:

> I don't agree with using the level 0 as a target. To define following 
> levels, we need a base and that is the purpose of the level 0; It acts 
> as a starting line for the rest of this community group work.

I’m sorry. I don’t mean to be dense, but why is a base necessary? Without it, what won’t the group be able to work on?

-Jason

Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 05:25:12 UTC