- From: Dave Olsen <dmolsen@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:45:21 -0400
- To: public-coremob@w3.org
It turns out that I was linking to the wrong repo for Ringmark tests in my original Google Doc [1]. Rick Waldron gave me the heads up. I've updated the doc to reflect the new-to-me location of Ringmark [2] and its documentation. I've also added a sheet that lists all of the Modernizr & Ringmark tests that I originally excluded as not appropriate for my project. Now every test in both suites should be reflected in one doc. Related to this issue is the question, "What is the official repository that we should fork and work from if we want to contribute tests to Ringmark/coremob?" Is the current repo [3] out-of-date? I believe I found the Facebook fork of that repo (which is where I pulled the wrong test links from) on an official blog post [4]. Both repositories may need to be updated to refer to the new repo. Rick also mentioned that Ringmark is based on a survey of devs. If there was an arbitrary cutoff for tests that made Ringmark initially then maybe those tests that were ignored on the first go-around could be picked up by the community. A list might prove useful in motivating members. I'm ignorant of the history of Ringmark and coremob so if this has already been discussed I apologize. I've scanned the original thread on the Ringmark announcement and nothing jumped out at me related to this issue. [1] - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AntZUVoCEOyYdFRpUjZOWUZyaWxoSTlLLW1XVHVldHc [2] - https://github.com/facebook/rng.io [3] - https://github.com/coremob/coremob-tests [4] - https://developers.facebook.com/html5/blog/post/2012/04/03/ringmark-is-now-open-source/ -- http://dmolsen.com
Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 17:46:10 UTC