Re: F2F registration

On 6/4/12 8:52 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2012, at 13:50 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> On 6/1/12 6:11 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
>>>      https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/52857/coremob-menlo/
>> Will at least some part of an agenda be agreed upon before the meeting or is this going to be (mostly) an unconference style meeting [1]? (The only agenda I've seen is [2] so if I missed an agenda page announcement, please let me know where I can find it.)
> The meeting will be largely unconference-style, but we will provide guidance ahead of time to help structure the meeting. The topics will be the ones you expect: dropping Level 0, moving forward on Level 1, progress on testing, quality of implementation testing.
>
...

>> Also, since it appears a lot of CG members will not attend this f2f meeting, is the expectation that any "decision" made during the meeting will be tentative, pending input from folks that do not attend the meeting?
> Decisions made at the meeting will be binding, people who cannot attend are welcome to provide their input ahead of time and it will be included in the discussion.

Boo, hiss, especially since the agenda is mostly unconference style and 
there may not be voice conference for remote attendees.

-AB

Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 13:30:47 UTC