- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:52:56 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: "public-coremob@w3.org Mobile" <public-coremob@w3.org>
Hi Art, On Jun 2, 2012, at 13:50 , Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 6/1/12 6:11 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/52857/coremob-menlo/ > > Will at least some part of an agenda be agreed upon before the meeting or is this going to be (mostly) an unconference style meeting [1]? (The only agenda I've seen is [2] so if I missed an agenda page announcement, please let me know where I can find it.) The meeting will be largely unconference-style, but we will provide guidance ahead of time to help structure the meeting. The topics will be the ones you expect: dropping Level 0, moving forward on Level 1, progress on testing, quality of implementation testing. > I noticed only about 6 of the CG's 220 members are now registered for this meeting (although the deadline is June 8). Is there a critical mass number of participants that is required for the meeting or will it held regardless of the number of participants? The number of registered participants is now 12. I would expect that number to grow a fair bit more (and will extend the deadline if needed). The meeting will go ahead no matter what. > Also, since it appears a lot of CG members will not attend this f2f meeting, is the expectation that any "decision" made during the meeting will be tentative, pending input from folks that do not attend the meeting? Decisions made at the meeting will be binding, people who cannot attend are welcome to provide their input ahead of time and it will be included in the discussion. > Lastly, if at all possible, please do plan to use the W3C voice conference bridge. If at all possible, we will make a bridge available — but I can't promise that just yet. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 12:53:27 UTC