- From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
- Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:59:26 -0400
- To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
- cc: Joseph Smarr <jsmarr@google.com>, jsmarr@stanfordalumni.org, Joseph Smarr <jsmarr@gmail.com>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-contacts-coord@w3.org, vcarddav@ietf.org
Hi Simon, --On September 9, 2010 12:35:37 PM -0400 Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote: >> Group prefix can be used for this. > > I don't think the group prefix can be used for anything other than > what's in the draft now. It just won't be interoperable. We would need > to add semantics that don't exist now. The current draft says: "The group construct is used to group related properties together." I think that adequately describes what we want to do with ADR and LABEL. Just FYI OS X AddressBook.app uses the group prefix in such a way. -- Cyrus Daboo
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2010 20:00:01 UTC