- From: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:25:28 -0500
- To: Patrick Anderson <agnucius@gmail.com>
- Cc: hellekin <hellekin@cepheide.org>, public-community-io <public-community-io@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACvcBVpxu4wqj_9wHdnbW_BR4Z=hcOAF6veuL=AhJGdXhVDrQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hmm... http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/pangaia/index.php?title=New_economic_system On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>wrote: > at one point I got into automata and started wondering about scheme, lisp, > prolog and all that...... > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Mark, thanks for the link. I'll keep it in mind. Early on I thought about >> visualization in layers to keep to make things a bit easier spatially (if I >> can recall correctly), I also thought about various hypergraphs and topic >> maps at one point. In addition, I'll admit that I am very interested in >> neuroscience. >> >> <1> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergraph >> <2> http://topicmaps.org/ >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Brent Shambaugh < >> brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm feeling strongly about this. I also know some people who might be >>> able to help with this. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Brent Shambaugh < >>> brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I have a hunch a lot lies in things like Payswarm and Ripple. I mean it >>>> certainly is emotional for me. Payswarm can keep track of intentions, and >>>> Ripple allows of decentralized payment and may keep track of intentions. >>>> Something (experience and otherwise) is telling me to focus more on web >>>> payments. >>>> >>>> I've had a lot of problems with trying to look at everything to see >>>> patterns, try to avoid reinventing the wheel. Eventually, I concluded that >>>> to implement stuff I just needed to study more languages (but more, so it >>>> is looking like JavaScript) and if I was bothered by the theory or wanted >>>> help understanding how it would work best than CS stuff. It was all very >>>> confusing. >>>> >>>> Can I safely ditch https://www.coursera.org/course/hci (Human-Computer >>>> Interaction), https://www.coursera.org/course/pgm (Probabilistic >>>> Graphical Models), https://www.coursera.org/course/bigdata (Web >>>> Intelligence and Big Data), >>>> https://www.coursera.org/course/gamification (Gamification) and put it >>>> on the shelf for now? Clearly building a distributed economy is a massive >>>> undertaking, and these things could certainly come into play. Money, or at >>>> least some record of exchange, appears to be a very important part. Knowing >>>> this to build something may not be necessary. >>>> >>>> I'd like to commit more time to this, and obviously I have to focus in >>>> order to do that. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Patrick Anderson <agnucius@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Creating a usable barter system also requires actions be accompolished >>>>> *early* in time. >>>>> >>>>> Here is my vision of such a system: >>>>> >>>>> First of all, this requires something I call either a "Production >>>>> Arena", or (less often) a "Vertically Integrated Permaculture Mosaic". >>>>> >>>>> The Production Arena (or VIPM) is the interlocking Physical Sources >>>>> such as land and water rights and plants and animals and tools and other >>>>> things needed to create a "Basic Outcome" for all the participants. >>>>> >>>>> And so we attract middle-to-upper-income investors to supply the money >>>>> to buy these Physical Sources for an advertised return of organic goods and >>>>> services in the future - though they will actually be receiving >>>>> co-ownership in the Production Arena, and receiving the goods and services >>>>> as a 'side-effect' of that co-ownership. In this way we eliminate the >>>>> buying and selling of those goods and services. >>>>> >>>>> And we must also attract middle-to-lower-income investors to >>>>> cross-commit their *future* labor in return for co-ownership in the >>>>> Production Arena. >>>>> >>>>> By "cross-commit" I mean each worker will promise to work in a >>>>> specific part of the Production Arena (say milking cows) in return for >>>>> receiving co-ownership in many other parts of the Production Arena needed >>>>> to supply him with all of his basic needs. >>>>> >>>>> I need to refine how I explain this, because there is a bit more to it >>>>> that I did not include in the above... >>>>> >>>>> Each investors (whether committing money or future labor) will usually >>>>> receive a 'bundle' of property-rights *and* commitments from others to >>>>> perform the future labor necessary to accomplish that production. >>>>> >>>>> For example, the cow-milker would usually receive both ownership in >>>>> the dentist office *and* commitments from the dentist to fix his teeth in >>>>> the future when necessary. >>>>> >>>>> When used in conjunction these commitments create the kind of security >>>>> that insurance pretends to deliver. I sometimes call it "life assurance". >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Brent Shambaugh >>>> >>>> I've worked with polymers, I teach chemistry, I'm currently researching >>>> how to build better economies. >>>> Website: http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Brent Shambaugh >>> >>> I've worked with polymers, I teach chemistry, I'm currently researching >>> how to build better economies. >>> Website: http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Brent Shambaugh >> >> I've worked with polymers, I teach chemistry, I'm currently researching >> how to build better economies. >> Website: http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com >> > > > > -- > Brent Shambaugh > > I've worked with polymers, I teach chemistry, I'm currently researching > how to build better economies. > Website: http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com > -- Brent Shambaugh I've worked with polymers, I teach chemistry, I'm currently researching how to build better economies. Website: http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 06:33:36 UTC