W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > February 2019

The "ZAP" example for CR 5 contradicts itself

From: <noreply@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 01:30:23 +0000
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1gwdBv-0006E9-UH@asterion.w3.org>
Name: Mitchell Evan
Email: mtchllvn@gmail.com
Affiliation: Level Access
Document: UW
Item Number: Understanding Conformance
Part of Item: Intent
Comment Type: editorial
Summary of Issue: The "ZAP" example for CR 5 contradicts itself
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
The section "Understanding Requirement 5" has an example with this sentence: "Although ZAP is accessibility-supported, the information that is presented in ZAP is also presented on the page in HTML, so ZAP is not relied upon." A word is missing, which causes the sentence to contradict itself.

Proposed Change:
Add the word "not". The sentence should be: "Although ZAP is not accessibility-supported, the information that is presented in ZAP is also presented on the page in HTML, so ZAP is not relied upon."
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2019 01:30:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 21 February 2019 01:30:26 UTC