W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Firefox supports zoom ( LC-2796)

From: james nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:54:05 -0700
Message-ID: <52409C5D.7050402@oracle.com>
To: akirkpat@adobe.com
CC: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Thanks.
The resolution looks good.

Regards,
James


On 9/22/2013 7:46 AM, akirkpat@adobe.com wrote:
>   Dear james.nurthen@oracle.com,
>
> The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed the
> comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the
> Understanding WCAG 2.0 (Public Review Draft) published on 11 Jul 2013.
> Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us
> comments!
>
> The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.
>
> Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
> public-comments-wcag20@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 2 Oct
> 2013. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
> solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
> consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
> formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
> transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
> Track.
>
> Thanks,
>
> For the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
> Michael Cooper
> W3C Staff Contact
>
>   1. http://www.w3.org/mid/E1V5SYE-0002Kg-7v@tibor.w3.org
>   2. http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2013/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20130711/
>
>
> =====
>
> Your comment on :
>> Name: James Nurthen
>> Email: james.nurthen@oracle.com
>> Affiliation: Oracle
>> Document: UW
>> Item Number: Understanding Success Criterion 1.4.4
>> Part of Item: Intent
>> Comment Type: technical
>> Summary of Issue: Firefox supports zoom
>> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
>> The 3rd paragraph states
>> "The author cannot rely on the user agent to satisfy this Success
>> Criterion for HTML content if users do not have access to a user agent
>> with zoom support. For example, if they work in an environment that
>> requires them to use IE 6 or Firefox."
>>
>> Firefox has supported zoom for a long time. I suggest dropping the
>> mention of Firefox
>>
>> Proposed Change:
>> change paragraph 3 to
>>
>> The author cannot rely on the user agent to satisfy this Success
>> Criterion for HTML content if users do not have access to a user agent
>> with zoom support. For example, if they work in an environment that
>> requires them to use IE 6.
>
> Working Group Resolution (LC-2796):
> We agree, Firefox has supported zoom for a long time and the language
> should be updated in the intent.  We will make the change that you
> recommended.
>
> The 3rd paragraph will state:
> [DONE] The author cannot rely on the user agent to satisfy this Success
> Criterion for HTML content if users do not have access to a user agent with
> zoom support. For example, if they work in an environment that requires
> them to use IE 6.
>
> ----
>
>
Received on Monday, 23 September 2013 19:55:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:17 UTC