Re: G94: Providing short text alternative for non-text content that serves the same purpose and presents the same information as the non-text content ( LC-2763)

 Dear Devarshi Pant ,

The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed the
comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 published on 11 Dec 2008. Thank you for
having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-comments-wcag20@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 30 June
2013. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
Michael Cooper
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJGQbjtggZO9V57GzPdpkBfOyi84zMiWRnt2raFhk_ZbH8VPww@mail.gmail.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/


=====

Your comment on WCAG 2.0 Layers of Guidance:
> See URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20120103/G94
> Under Description, read the sentence after paragraph 3. This contains
> an
> extra 'a,' given as: "In deciding what text to include in the
> alternative,
> it is a often a good idea to consider the following questions:"
> Proposed Change: "In deciding what text to include in the alternative,
> it
> is often a good idea to consider the following questions:"


Working Group Resolution (LC-2763):
Thanks for the comment - we'll get this text corrected as you describe.

----

Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 13:43:02 UTC