- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:54:25 -0700
- To: k.probiesch@gmail.com
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHu5OWZtFZJDBbgcL3c99YYSz1hawkmSQxxskJzxY0bPMUWnpg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 1:37 AM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote: > Name: Kerstin Probiesch > Email: k.probiesch@gmail.com > Affiliation: > Document: TD > Item Number: PDF3 > Part of Item: Examples > Comment Type: technical > Summary of Issue: Test procedure Example 4 will not work in all documents > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > In technique PDF 3 the reflow mode is listed as one of the possible > testing procedures for 1.3.2, 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.4.3. > > In PDF for example white text on colored backgrounds very often /mostly > the white text isn't visible because the blue background won't be displayed > in the reflow-mode. Therefore the test procedure in Example 4 is not > working in these situations and for these SCs and testers might come to > different / invalid results for example if one tester uses a screenreader > and another tester the reflow-mode. > > Proposed Change: > Proposed change: > > a. Delete example 4 because of the risk of invalid results in evaluations > (preferred) or > > b. Add a note that this testing procedure should't be used if documents > contents white text. > > > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ Thank you for the comment. Based on your and others feedback, we have significantly edited the PDF3 technique. We have added a note to Example 5 (formerly example 4) to highlight this scenario and suggest a process which allows authors to use this technique. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 23:54:52 UTC