W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Examples 5 and 6 should be deleted

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:52:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHu5OWZyQ30D_RSL6=ucVd=ySDRgmcXunk=3E_-gJcmXDvDEOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: djohnson@commonlook.com
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:58 PM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote:

> Name: Duff Johnson
> Email: djohnson@commonlook.com
> Affiliation: NetCentric Technologies
> Document: TD
> Item Number: PDF3
> Part of Item: Examples
> Comment Type: technical
> Summary of Issue: Examples 5 and 6 should be deleted
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> SC 1.3.2 requires attention to LOGICAL reading order (denoted in PDF via
> "tags"), not the order of the PDF content stream. Examples 5 and 6 reflect
> Adobe tool functionality specific to reordering the content stream.
>
> Proposed Change:
> Delete examples 5 and 6.
>
> ================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
Thanks you for your comment.

We have edited PDF3 to make it clearer that logical order as represented in
the tagging order must be correct in order to offer a correct reading
order. Note that for text nodes, the order of the words in the content
stream must also be correct.


Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 23:52:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:15 UTC