- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:19:03 -0700
- To: sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-ID: <BANLkTinmRbeqMpzAFGFsTTq2kh6hjzm0QLiCvH5jhPwHUjNObg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:58 AM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote: > > Name: Sylvie Duchateau > Email: sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr > Affiliation: Association BrailleNet > Document: UW > Item Number: Introduction to Understanding WCAG 2.0 > Part of Item: Intent > Comment Type: editorial > Summary of Issue: Using comas, semi colons or full stop at the end of each > list item. > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > During the review process of the French translation of Understanding WCAG > 2.0, the French reviewers noted that punctuations would not be used in an > appropriate way, in particular at the end of each item of a list ul li. They > request that punctuations should be reviewed in a future version of the > document. > > Proposed Change: > In particular, concerning the three items list, just before heading 3 > "sufficient and advisory techniques" the three items list should end with a > full stop, as we reach the intent of a section. > Actual wording: > "descriptions of the intent of the Success Criteria, including benefits, > and examples" should be changed in: > descriptions of the intent of the Success Criteria, including benefits, and > examples." > We inform the Working Group that we added this full stop at the end of the > list, but only for this particular issue. > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ Thank you for catching this. We corrected this instance, and hope to make a complete review of the documents at some point. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 01:19:29 UTC