On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:17 PM, devarshi pant <devarshipant@gmail.com>wrote: > Name: Devarshi Pant > Email: devarshipant@gmail.com > Item Number: F89: Failure of 2.4.4, 2.4.9 and 4.1.2 due to using null alt > on an image where the image is the only content in a link > Part of Item: Description > Comment Type: Technical > Summary of Issue: The second line, "This introduces a "stuttering" effect > when two nearly links have the same name, and authors attempts to eliminate > the redundancy by providing a null alt attribute for the image." is unclear. > > Two issues: > > 1. Replace 'nearly' with a more appropriate word. > > 2. Replace 'authors attempts' with a grammatically correct version. > > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): For example, > something like: > > Ex 1: This introduces a "stuttering" effect when two adjacent links have > the same name. Authors attempt to eliminate this redundancy by providing a > null alt attribute for the image. > > Or, > > Ex 2: This introduces a "stuttering" effect in two closely placed links > with the same name, which authors attempt to eliminate by providing a null > alt attribute for the image. > > Or, > > Ex 3: This introduces a "stuttering" effect in nearby links with the same > name, and, authors attempt to eliminate this effect by providing a null alt > attribute for the image." > > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ Thank you for catching this. We have edited the document as you suggested. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working GroupReceived on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 01:12:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:14 UTC