- From: <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:51:41 +0000
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Detlev Fischer Email: fischer@dias.de Affiliation: DIAS GmbH Document: TD Item Number: G179 Part of Item: Examples Comment Type: general comment Summary of Issue: Example 3 does not fit (because here, the text container does resize) Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): Example 3 does not fit the technique which relates to fixed-size containers, because here, the text container *does* resize (size defined in em). Actually, I think what is *really* meant would have to be called "G179: Ensuring that there is no loss of content or functionality when the text resizes and text containers do not <del>resize</del> <ins>change width</ins> - at least this is what examples 1 and 2 refer to. Proposed Change: * Delete example 3 * Change name of technique to make it clear that the topic is *fixed width* containers that expand at the bottom through reflow of text when the text size is increased to 200%
Received on Friday, 1 July 2011 09:51:42 UTC