W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2011

Example 3 does not fit (because here, the text container does resize)

From: <noreply@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:51:41 +0000
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QcaNx-0005XB-De@lowblow.w3.org>

Name: Detlev Fischer
Email: fischer@dias.de
Affiliation: DIAS GmbH
Document: TD
Item Number: G179
Part of Item: Examples
Comment Type: general comment
Summary of Issue: Example 3 does not fit (because here, the text container does resize)
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
Example 3 does not fit the technique which relates to fixed-size containers, because here, the text container *does* resize (size defined in em). 
Actually, I think what is *really* meant would have to be called "G179: Ensuring that there is no loss of content or functionality when the text resizes and text containers do not <del>resize</del> <ins>change width</ins> - at least this is what examples 1 and 2 refer to.

Proposed Change:
* Delete example 3
* Change name of technique to make it clear that the topic is *fixed width* containers that expand at the bottom through reflow of text when the text size is increased to 200%
Received on Friday, 1 July 2011 09:51:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:14 UTC