W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2010

G192: Example

From: <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:18:57 +0000
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Oc7qj-0004Hd-Rq@crusher.w3.org>

Name: Makoto Ueki
Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
Affiliation: Infoaxia, Inc.
Document: TD
Item Number: G192
Part of Item: Examples
Comment Type: general comment
Summary of Issue: G192: Example
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
It reads "Specification requirements that can not be identified by validation are also checked and any failures are corrected."

Need more concrete description and examples for "Specification requirements that can not be identified by validation". We couldn't understand what this means.

Proposed Change:
Add reason and/or description and examples why only validating web pages would not be sufficient for fully conforming to specifications.
Received on Friday, 23 July 2010 02:18:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:13 UTC