- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 02:06:47 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Yukie Motomiya Email: yukie.motomiya.zm@hitachi.com Affiliation: Hitachi, Ltd. Document: W2 Item Number: Conformance Requirement 4: Accessibility-Supported Technologies Only Part of Item: Comment Type: question Summary of Issue: Necessity of sample of test files and evaluation report Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): We have two questions on Conformance requirements 4): Q1. How can we judge the reliability of the information tells us that the technology is accessibility supported? Q2 Do you think that the baseline of the accessible here is ambiguous? We couldn\'t understand the reason why there are any rules regarding the person or group who can evaluate and publish information on Accessibility-Supported Technologies. If this information can be published only by WCAG2.0 working group or any authorities, we can easily accept that it can be reliable. But everyone can do that now and we have to take time to judge it. Also it can be a trouble if we find information tell us differently regarding one technology. Proposed Change: Present the sample of test files and formats of evaluation report. Test files should include plain HTML file, audio contents, movie contents and so on.
Received on Monday, 3 March 2008 02:06:53 UTC