- From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:05:22 +1000
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
---------------------------------------------------------- Comment 26: Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/000901c69538$2e394450$f4c9b23a@tkhcomputer (Issue ID: LC-1046) 2.2.1 & 2.2.3: As previously discussed, further details should be provided when timeouts is an important part of a real-time event or an activity when timing is essential. Proposed Change: I am happy to write an additional set of criteria (with Loretta) ---------------------------- Response from Working Group: ---------------------------- We have modified the fourth bullet of SC 2.2.1 to be testable by removing the word "important". And we have moved the auction example from How To Meet SC 2.2.3 to How To Meet SC 2.2.1. ---------------------------- Response from GSW: ---------------------------- Thank you for addressing my comment
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 16:05:38 UTC