Comment LC-1065 from Gian Sampson-Wild on 2007-07-06 (public-comments-wcag20@w3.org from July 2007)

From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:31:29 +1000
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006401c7bfe2$bc8ab6f0$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>

Comment 42:

Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/000901c69538$2e394450$f4c9b23a@tkhcomputer
(Issue ID: LC-1065)

4.2.4: This SC does not make sense. Shouldn't this be at Level 2?

Proposed Change:

Explain this SC

----------------------------
Response from Working Group:
----------------------------

We have completely rewritten the conformance section of the guidelines, and
we have moved most of GL 4.2 into the conformance section. This is no longer
a success criterion. The section titled "Three levels of conformance"
contains: "It is recommended that even non-conforming content conform to the
extent possible."

This applies independent of conformance level.
----------------------------
Response from GSW:
----------------------------
Thank you for addressing my comment

Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 15:31:47 UTC