W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2007

Comment LC-1089

From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:32:57 +1000
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004801c7bfda$8ebcc4a0$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>

Comment 64:

Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer
(Issue ID: LC-1089)

Example B: automatic updates are not timeouts.

Proposed Change:

Remove this example from this SC

Response from Working Group:

The Working Group views automatic updates, which happen after a set amount
of time or on a periodic basis, to be time-outs and intended that case to be
covered by this success criterion. This may not have been clear so we have
added the following content to the How to Meet 2.2.1 document:

Any process that happens without user initiation after a set time or on a
periodic basis is a time-out. This includes partial or full updates of or
changes to content, or expiry of a window of opportunity for a user to react
to a request for input.
Response from GSW:
Thank you for addressing my comment
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 14:33:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:46:01 UTC