Comment LC-1095

Comment 68:

Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer
(Issue ID: LC-1095)

Example - A questionnaire with a timeout: In this example, there are several
recommendations that certainly would make the questionnaire more accessible
(alert popups, information on timeout etc) but these do not actually relate
to this (or any) SC. These are excellent requirements - they should be
developed into SC

Proposed Change:

Create new SC (I am happy to help with this)

----------------------------
Response from Working Group:
----------------------------

This example illustrates the use of techniques for both 2.2.6 and 2.2.1. To
make this clear, we have added a note that reads, "Refer to [Techniques for
Addressing Success Criterion 2.2.1] for techniques related to providing
notifications about time-outs." to the listing of sufficient techniques in
2.2.6.
----------------------------
Response from GSW:
----------------------------
This looks like an exact repeat of 1096. Can you please clarify for me?

Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 14:28:52 UTC