W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2007

Comment LC-1101

From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:08:02 +1000
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003801c7bfd7$149ee520$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>

Comment 74:

Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer
(Issue ID: LC-1101)

Examples: The example in SC 2.3.1 (Level 1) specifies two lightning flashes,
whereas the example in SC 2.3.3 (Level 3) specifies three lightning flashes.
A level 3 SC should have less flash than a Level 1 SC

Proposed Change:

Rewrite the examples or the SC

Response from Working Group:

Good catch. The example for SC 2.3.1 has been rewritten as two examples.
One with flashing in a small area, and one that matches the SC 2.3.2 example
to show that using the tighter SC 2.3.2 criterion is sufficient for Level A.
The new SC 2.3.1 example reads: "Example 1:  Web site has video of muzzle
flash of machine gun fire but limits the size of the flashing image to a
small portion of the screen below the flash threshold size."
Response from GSW:
Thank you for addressing my comment
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 14:08:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:46:01 UTC