W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > December 2007

Re: EOWG's replies to WCAG WG resolutions of EOWG comments on May 2007 Draft of WCAG 2.0

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:58:16 -0800
Message-ID: <824e742c0712111558v1d46c383sfd446716f4f5f251@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Shawn Henry" <shawn@w3.org>
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

We modified the wording in the Conformance section to address this issue.

Regards,

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact

On behalf of the WCAG Working Group

> >----------------------------------------------------------
> >Comment 3: accessibility-supported technologies
> >Source:
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Jun/0408.html
> >(Issue ID: 2273)
> >----------------------------
> >Original Comment:
> >----------------------------
> >
> >1. [conformance section] EOWG feels that the goal for the section on
> >accessibility supported technologies should be that the average developer
> >should be able to read the section and understand the concept; understand
> >the importance of the concept; and understand that one should be able to go
> >to a list of accessibility supported technologies.
> >
> >---------------------------------------------
> >Response from Working Group:
> >---------------------------------------------
> >
> >The new language should be closer to this goal.  This is technical
> >though and difficult to make clear.  If there are specific suggestions
> >for wording, please forward for consideration.
>
> EOWG reply on Comment 3 accessibility-supported technologies:
> It looks like most of this has been moved to Understanding; which some in EOWG strongly support. We may have additional comments on the wording in Understanding later.
>
> One minor thing we note in the WCAG 2.0 document: The first part of the Conformance section still says, "This section...  It also explains what it means for Web content technologies to be accessibility-supported..." -- while it is mentioned here, it is really explained in Understanding now.
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 23:58:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:09 UTC