- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:58:16 -0800
- To: "Shawn Henry" <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
We modified the wording in the Conformance section to address this issue. Regards, Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group > >---------------------------------------------------------- > >Comment 3: accessibility-supported technologies > >Source: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Jun/0408.html > >(Issue ID: 2273) > >---------------------------- > >Original Comment: > >---------------------------- > > > >1. [conformance section] EOWG feels that the goal for the section on > >accessibility supported technologies should be that the average developer > >should be able to read the section and understand the concept; understand > >the importance of the concept; and understand that one should be able to go > >to a list of accessibility supported technologies. > > > >--------------------------------------------- > >Response from Working Group: > >--------------------------------------------- > > > >The new language should be closer to this goal. This is technical > >though and difficult to make clear. If there are specific suggestions > >for wording, please forward for consideration. > > EOWG reply on Comment 3 accessibility-supported technologies: > It looks like most of this has been moved to Understanding; which some in EOWG strongly support. We may have additional comments on the wording in Understanding later. > > One minor thing we note in the WCAG 2.0 document: The first part of the Conformance section still says, "This section... It also explains what it means for Web content technologies to be accessibility-supported..." -- while it is mentioned here, it is really explained in Understanding now. >
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 23:58:44 UTC