W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > May 2006

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 03:27:41 +0000 (UTC)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060531032741.CB778DAF30@w3c4-bis.w3.org>


Name: Lynn Alford
Email: imla@jcu.edu.au
Affiliation: James Cook University
Document: UW
Item Number: (none selected)
Part of Item: Techniques
Comment Type: GE
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
In the document \"About Baseline and WCAG2.0\" it states



\"They would use the HTML 4.01 techniques described as “sufficient” in Understanding WCAG 2.0. (Authors may further enhance the user experience by also using additional HTML techniques listed as “advisory” (optional) in Understanding WCAG 2.0.)\"



The sections with advisory techniques are clearly labeled as \"Additional Techniques (Advisory) for x.x.x\"  



The techniques deemed as sufficient requires that you read the paragraph under the title \"Techniques for Addressing Success Criterion x.x.x\" which does says \"Each numbered item in this section represents a technique or combinations of techniques that the WCAG Working Group deems to be sufficient to meet success criterion x.x.x as long as the technologies used are in the baseline you are using.\"

Proposed Change:
Clearly mark the \'sufficient\' techniques in the document to aid understanding both documents.
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2006 03:27:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:06 UTC