W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > June 2006

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 15:32:15 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060602153215.7560633205@kearny.w3.org>

Name: Chris Ridpath
Email: chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca
Affiliation: ATRC University of Toronto
Document: TD
Item Number: G96: Providing textual identification of items that otherwise rely only on shape and/or po...
Part of Item: Description
Comment Type: TE
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
Very broad. Should only be used when there is ambiguity. i.e. if there is only one image then OK to refer to it as \"see image below\".

Does the use of \"top\" (WCAG2 navigation buttons) fall under this? What about G74 that uses text \"Details in text following the chart:\"

Proposed Change:
Make it clear that this is needed only if there is ambiguity.
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 15:32:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:06 UTC