- From: Eric Gateau <eric.gateau@webaccessibilite.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 15:00:15 +0200
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Hi everyone, 1. ...should WCAG 2.0 have 2 or 3 levels of conformance? Even if I could live with 2 levels, I think that the 3 levels should be kept because : - the transition between WCAG 1 and 2 should be easier - the levels, as described in the current draft, do mean something - the first level has to be a the first step toward accessibility and should not afraid authors and/or policy makers and/or managers Beside that, in order to make these guidelines more effective and more easily applicable, I feel that all the success criteria have to be testable (even the level 3 ones). That's why I suggest to remove to another document criteria like : "When text requires reading ability at or above the upper secondary education level, one or more of the following supplements is available" (3.1 L3 SC5) 2. Should a validity success criterion be addressed at Level 1 or Level 2? My experiences show that people caring about accessibility are aware of validity and Vice Versa. That's why I should leave the validity success criterion at level 2. Moreover, a site whith an invalid markup as a result of a tag soup should encounters many accessibility problems. Yours Faithfully, Eric Gateau. Http://www.webaccessibilite.net
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:00:29 UTC