RE: Call For Consensus (CFC)

Hi Lisa and Roy,

Would you please add me to “3. Significant contributors to the issue papers”?

I wrote 2 of the issue papers.

  *   The Original Github version wayfinding-indoors<https://github.com/w3c/coga/blob/main/issue-papers/wayfinding-indoors.html> referenced in Cognitive Accessibility Issue Papers: Technology-Assisted Indoor Navigation and Wayfindings<https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/issue-papers-v2/issue-papers/Technology-Assisted-Indoor-Navigation-and-Wayfindings.html>; and
  *   Web Security and Privacy Technologies<https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/issue-papers-v2/issue-papers/privacy-security.html>.

Thank you.

John

John Rochford
UMass Chan Medical School
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Faculty, Family Medicine & Community Health
DisabilityInfo.org<https://www.disabilityinfo.org/>
EasyText.AI<https://easytext.ai/>
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-rochford/>
About Me<https://about.me/johnrochford>
Schedule a meeting with me.<https://calendly.com/johnrochford>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.

From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2024 8:05 AM
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>; roy@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call For Consensus (CFC)

Hi Folks

Just for the record this CFC has passed without objection

Roy can you move  the new  draft<https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/issue-papers-v2/issue-papers/index.html> to replace the old editors draft. I think the old draft is  at https://w3c.github.io/coga/issue-papers/


Thanks and all the best
Lisa

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 2:29 PM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com<mailto:lisa1seeman@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Fokes


Hi Folks,

This is a Call For Consensus (CFC)

On this week's call we agreed to move forward with the Editor's  draft of our issue papers.  You can see the draft<https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/issue-papers-v2/issue-papers/index.html> and check the links to the issue papers

I added the editors notes as we agreed on the call. However I made small editorial changes so that it would work with the W3C system. (They did not allow lists in an editor's note.)



Next steps: My next step would be to start the publication process with Roy and ask APA and AG to approve it, with the understanding that there will be more editorial changes in this draft including moving sentences around so that it reads better or even deleting content that is repeated in two places.



Action:

  *   If  you agree with the next step   you can write back "+1" .
  *   If  you disagree with this decision you can write back "-1" and say why you object .
  *   You can also write "0" if you do not have a strong opinion either way.

You can object until 8 am  boston time 22nd August 2024.

Not writing back will be seen as agreement

 Thanks and all the best

Lisa

--
All the best

Lisa Seeman-Horwitz

LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>