Re: Call For Consensus (CFC)

Hi Folks

Just for the record this CFC has passed without objection

Roy can you move  the new  draft
<https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/issue-papers-v2/issue-papers/index.html> to
replace the old editors draft. I think the old draft is  at
https://w3c.github.io/coga/issue-papers/

Thanks and all the best
Lisa

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 2:29 PM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Fokes
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This is a Call For Consensus (CFC)
>
> On this week's call we agreed to move forward with the Editor's  draft of
> our issue papers.  You can see the draft
> <https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/issue-papers-v2/issue-papers/index.html> and
> check the links to the issue papers
>
> I added the editors notes as we agreed on the call. However I made small
> editorial changes so that it would work with the W3C system. (They did not
> allow lists in an editor's note.)
>
>
> *Next steps: *My next step would be to start the publication process with
> Roy and ask APA and AG to approve it, with the understanding that there
> will be more editorial changes in this draft including moving sentences
> around so that it reads better or even deleting content that is repeated in
> two places.
>
>
>
> *Action: *
>
>
>    - If  you agree with the next step   you can write back "+1" .
>    - If  you disagree with this decision you can write back "-1" and say
>    why you object .
>    - You can also write "0" if you do not have a strong opinion
>    either way.
>
> You can object until 8 am  boston time 22nd August 2024.
>
> Not writing back will be seen as agreement
>
>  Thanks and all the best
>
> Lisa
>
> --
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman-Horwitz
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>