- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 15:13:42 +0300
- To: Julie Rawe <jrawe@understood.org>
- Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKExBMLdJx0+cXeQ+1RSU-XJQ=RXZjhT1uZgE1t2PN9CmPxKVA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Julie We have not checked all the papers to know what we do not know, but the ones we have checked are out of date and some of the information is no longer relevant . Sometimes the change is for the good,for example, proposed solutions for research are now practical solutions. The warning is very important. All the best lisa On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 4:13 PM Julie Rawe <jrawe@understood.org> wrote: > Hi, Lisa, it would be great if we could adjust the editor's note so the > "old" issue papers sound like they may still have some value. Two changes > to consider: > > - *Replace "is out of date" with "was published several years ago."* > - "out of date" may sound like the paper is no longer useful. > - *Make clearer what kind of errors the issue paper might contain. * > - Are we trying to say the paper may contain major errors, like the > old studies in the issue paper may have been disproven by new studies? Or > are we mainly talking about minor errors like spelling and punctuation? > > > With the above concerns in mind, I am suggesting two alternatives that > differ based on how dire we want to be about possible errors: > > 1. *Less dire wording:* > Editor's note: This issue paper was published several years ago. It > may be missing new research that is relevant to this topic. It may also > contain minor errors such as spelling and punctuation. > > 2. *More dire wording: * > Editor's note: This issue paper was published several years ago. It > may be missing new research that has significantly changed the way > researchers approach this issue. It may also contain minor errors such as > spelling and punctuation. > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 5:42 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Folks >> >> We agreed to add editors notes to old issue papers that were not being >> updated. >> Are you comfortable with the following text? >> 1. On the old issue papers >> >> Editor's note: >> *This issue paper is out of date. It may contain errors and may be >> missing new research.* >> >> >> >> 2. On the symbols paper we could have : >> >> Editor's note: >> *This issue paper is out of date. An update is being worked on >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L9-Wo2a78Ahuu3Q-16iyJUY8vp0pr4GWanylj6j3q7Q/edit#heading=h.tq3x4qwxxtd2>.* >> >> >> Let us know any objections and suggestions before mondays call. >> >> -- >> All the best >> >> Lisa Seeman-Horwitz >> >> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter >> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> >> >
Received on Sunday, 9 June 2024 12:14:24 UTC