- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 10:20:46 +0300
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKExBMJaNAPFhpagA2a-OMM8v_ft+b+ndz5O5jrWB1bJcqECgA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Folks As we have no further comments or objections I will assume we are agreeing to pass this on to APA All the best Lisa On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 8:22 PM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks > > This is a Call For Consensus (CFC) > > On last week's call agreed on our functional needs review. You can see > the draft at: functional needs review > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ndRziXRfnyAgDaL8ctByQagDdM36H8QxV44lO3u8zgc/edit#> > (Our review is in the table in the top of the document) > > Please look it over and check you are happy with it. Once we have > approved it we can send it to APA (our parent group). We may still have > some small editorial changes. > > *Action: * > > > - If you agree with the new work statement you can write back > "+1" . > - If you disagree with this decision you can write back "-1" and say > why you object . > - You can also write "0" if you feel it needs small changes . (Please > let us know what to change) > > You can object until 2 pm boston time 08/08/2022. > > Not writing back will be seen as agreement > > Thanks and all the best > > Lisa >
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2022 07:21:34 UTC